🔗 Share this article

Thhese times exhibit a very unique occurrence: the first-ever US parade of the babysitters. Their attributes range in their skills and attributes, but they all possess the common mission – to stop an Israeli infringement, or even destruction, of Gaza’s unstable truce. Since the hostilities concluded, there have been rare days without at least one of Donald Trump’s envoys on the territory. Just in the last few days featured the likes of a senior advisor, Steve Witkoff, JD Vance and Marco Rubio – all appearing to execute their assignments.

The Israeli government engages them fully. In just a few short period it launched a wave of operations in the region after the killings of two Israel Defense Forces (IDF) personnel – resulting, as reported, in many of local casualties. A number of officials called for a renewal of the war, and the Israeli parliament enacted a initial measure to annex the occupied territories. The US response was somehow ranging from “no” and “hell no.”

But in more than one sense, the US leadership appears more intent on maintaining the current, uneasy stage of the ceasefire than on progressing to the following: the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip. Regarding that, it appears the US may have goals but little tangible plans.

Currently, it is unknown when the planned global governing body will actually assume control, and the similar goes for the appointed peacekeeping troops – or even the makeup of its members. On a recent day, a US official declared the United States would not impose the structure of the foreign contingent on Israel. But if Benjamin Netanyahu’s administration persists to dismiss one alternative after another – as it did with the Turkish offer lately – what follows? There is also the opposite issue: who will decide whether the troops preferred by the Israelis are even prepared in the mission?

The question of the timeframe it will require to demilitarize Hamas is similarly vague. “The expectation in the leadership is that the multinational troops is going to at this point assume responsibility in disarming the organization,” stated Vance lately. “That’s may need a period.” Trump further highlighted the uncertainty, saying in an interview a few days ago that there is no “fixed” schedule for Hamas to lay down arms. So, theoretically, the unidentified participants of this still unformed global force could deploy to Gaza while the organization's members continue to wield influence. Are they dealing with a administration or a guerrilla movement? These represent only some of the concerns arising. Others might wonder what the result will be for average civilians as things stand, with the group carrying on to focus on its own opponents and opposition.

Current incidents have once again underscored the blind spots of local journalism on the two sides of the Gaza frontier. Every source seeks to scrutinize every possible perspective of Hamas’s breaches of the peace. And, in general, the reality that Hamas has been stalling the repatriation of the remains of slain Israeli captives has dominated the headlines.

On the other hand, coverage of civilian casualties in the region stemming from Israeli attacks has received little attention – or none. Consider the Israeli response actions following a recent Rafah event, in which a pair of soldiers were fatally wounded. While Gaza’s sources reported 44 deaths, Israeli television commentators criticised the “limited response,” which targeted just infrastructure.

This is nothing new. During the recent weekend, Gaza’s media office accused Israeli forces of violating the truce with Hamas 47 times since the agreement was implemented, causing the death of dozens of Palestinians and wounding an additional many more. The claim seemed unimportant to most Israeli news programmes – it was simply ignored. That included reports that 11 members of a Palestinian family were fatally shot by Israeli forces a few days ago.

Gaza’s civil defence agency said the individuals had been attempting to return to their dwelling in the a Gaza City neighbourhood of Gaza City when the bus they were in was attacked for allegedly going over the “demarcation line” that defines territories under Israeli army control. That limit is invisible to the human eye and shows up just on charts and in official records – not always obtainable to everyday individuals in the area.

Yet that occurrence hardly received a mention in Israeli news outlets. A major outlet mentioned it briefly on its online platform, referencing an IDF representative who explained that after a suspicious car was spotted, forces discharged cautionary rounds towards it, “but the vehicle continued to advance on the soldiers in a fashion that posed an immediate risk to them. The troops engaged to eliminate the risk, in line with the ceasefire.” Zero fatalities were claimed.

Given such perspective, it is understandable numerous Israeli citizens feel Hamas solely is to blame for infringing the ceasefire. This perception threatens fuelling calls for a more aggressive strategy in Gaza.

Sooner or later – possibly sooner rather than later – it will not be enough for American representatives to take on the role of kindergarten teachers, advising Israel what not to do. They will {have to|need